You can tailor your App Store page to match what users saw in your ad or what they were searching for: → Show the exact keyword in your screenshots → Align your creative with seasonality (Halloween, Christmas…) → Update for in-app events or exclusive collabs
You can use them on Apple Search Ads – Search results, Today tab and Search tab placements.
But actually testing them? Not so easy.
Here are the options: – Before/after comparisons. But it’s flawed as too many fluctuations. – Splitting ad groups, one with CPP, one with default. It works, but it’s messy.
No visual comparisons. No clear statistical significance. Hard to justify any decision.
✨ Here’s the twist: MobileActionjust released their CPP A/B Testing tool (still in closed beta).
The promise: – Multiple testing methods: compare CPPs, ad groups, or CPP vs. default. – 90% confidence level (no more guessing). – Clear test health and real-time insights. – Graphs to visualize trends over time. – Full logs of every change = transparency.
This is for marketers with complex ASA setups like multiple ad groups, creatives, CPPs. Definitely worth testing.
The idea is to test CPPs like you test creatives on other networks. → Go granular. → Get your creatives to align with your keywords / audience. → Be more relevant and drop your CPIs. → Get the best performance from your ASA campaigns.