Riot can afford it??
Arguments justifying Arcane on the grounds that "Riot can afford it" are already lost. This framing positions Arcane as a cost center. Marketing heads are commonly called "Heads of Growth" because marketing isn't supposed to be a cost center; instead, it ought to be a profit center. It's a beautiful show (I loved it! Thank you for your subsidy!), and if Riot wants to spend $250M on IP narcissism, they can and should (they're also a private company), but that's different from justifying it within a cost-benefit framework.It's a common misconception that this framework requires easily observable evidence to be useful. Instead, it asks for higher rigor and a direct answer to "How could Arcane deliver over $250M of ROI relative to the best use of investment?" The higher the investment, the more intense the scrutiny level. Another way to […]
