About the author
Antti Kananen
Seasoned entrepreneur, executive, director, general manager & project/product lead bringing innovation, technology, startups and games to life!
Journal 10 Antti Kananen March 1
Diving deep into intrinsic and social strategies and product positioning approaches has taught me a ton about how you can build successful products in truly propagative ways — on top of which educating my readers about these things has done the same, compounding ongoing discoveries and insight developments.
One topic that has been born through these explorations is what we’re covering in this article — intrinsic and social live ops in truly intrinsic and social ways vs. how these are currently run in games. On top of this, where I believe intrinsic and social aren’t fully enough, we cover some emergent and systematic mechanisms a bit to complement overall the gaps intrinsic and social could have alone, as I think great experiences need more or less these mechanisms as well vs. not having them at all.
Once again, buckle up! It’s going to be a bumpy yet insightful ride over these topics!
To start with, to truly maximize the potential of Live Ops being run with intrinsic and social means, the product itself must be built on strong intrinsic and social engagement principles.
Many games attempt to fit (/retrofit) engagement and monetization strategies onto an otherwise shallow core experience, which can lead to short-term revenue spikes but ultimately unsustainable future. There are literally thousands (and thousands more) of games that are having their life-cycles’ end points reached quicker vs. what their true potential could have been, if they would have based their strategies over what I’m covering here. Instead of repeating these games’ journeys, Live Ops should amplify what has already been discovered working, e.g., player motivations, deep social connections, and systemic/emergent gameplay that fosters long-term engagement.
When a game is designed with intrinsic engagement and social systems at its core (with systematic and emergent tie-ins), Live Ops becomes an extension of that experience rather than a patchwork of disconnected monetization attempts. The goal of what I’m covering here, is overall, with all things said already, to create a self-sustaining ecosystem (/product) where players continue engaging due to meaningful in-game motivations and relationships, not just because of artificial retention mechanics (/tactics).
Intrinsic engagement means players stay in the game because they are naturally motivated by its core experience — extending to its systems, challenges, and social interactions in a way autonomy, competencies, and relatedness parts are strongly in motion in terms of using intrinsic strategies. This is in contrast to extrinsic engagement, which relies on e.g., rewards, leaderboards, and external incentives to keep players coming back.
In terms of getting this right, and as already covered a bit, I also think there is a need for a layer of emergent and systematic mechanisms in these types of games to achieve self-sustainability — more or less.
Social engagement is one of the most underutilized levers in Live Ops. While many games have social features, few take full advantage of the deep social motivations that drive players to stay engaged. What is a deep social experience? You can read more about such a thing from these articles:
Overall, a game’s monetization strategy, to get things right for intrinsic and social live ops, should focus on intrinsic and group monetization mechanisms. You can read about such strategies for monetization here:
On top of intrinsic monetization and social group monetization, I also do believe a healthy monetization strategy for intrinsic and social Live Ops should focus on granularity and regularity — rather than short-term maximization.
For Live Ops to work in a truly intrinsic and social way — to have a business case- product marketing needs to reinforce these values through messaging, creatives, and positioning.
With these, I do think there is a way to get not just low CPI but also a steady organic flow of users that comes from the product’s self-propagation.
Properly aligning engagement and monetization strategies with marketability ensures that Live Ops not only sustain existing players but also attracts new ones efficiently.
What comes to intrinsic and social Live Ops strategy overall, and to the product’s design tie-in with Live Ops; Live Ops should not be an afterthought — it should be an extension of a well-designed product that fundamentally embraces intrinsic engagement and social depth. By building games with these principles in their DNA from the start, developers can create experiences that sustain themselves naturally over time — driving both engagement and monetization in a healthier, more sustainable way.
As the industry moves forward, the most successful games will be those that masterfully blend intrinsic product strategies, emergent/systemic mechanisms (where they come needed), social engagement loops, and sustainable Live Ops monetization into a cohesive, player(s)-first experience.
About the author
Seasoned entrepreneur, executive, director, general manager & project/product lead bringing innovation, technology, startups and games to life!
Please login or subscribe to continue.
No account? Register | Lost password
✖✖
Are you sure you want to cancel your subscription? You will lose your Premium access and stored playlists.
✖